It would appear, Mr. Stone, that your investigative work ( http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html ) is gaining some traction on the Net (below… and your letter to Mr. Rense).  It is becoming more difficult to dismiss your comments.  Your photos and supplemental information are looking more like a strong testament to the high level of technical care that the Japanese exercised in reinforcing the Fukushima facility. 

 The camera bomb would have been much more destructive if the Japanese had constructed a weak facility.  It looks like they did their homework and they knew what they were doing. But what happens when the Japanese people begin to understand that the tsunami bomb and the Fukushima camera bomb were party favors supplied by the Mossad?  There would have to be some serious blow back from that somewhere down the line.  And the Japanese have no constraints with respect to schedules, deadlines or performance review dates.  They can bide their time and return responses to the Israeli party favors whenever they please.

If the Mossad committed acts of war on Japanese soil, would the Japanese be out of order to send a nuclear “thank you notes” back to Israeli?  And who says that the Japanese have to deliver their messages with any particular level of nuclear “punch”?  What if they decide to spread nuclear waste around cities in Israel?  What if they decide to send operatives into Israel with suitcase or backpack nukes?  The situation in Israel could become unlivable via several different methods.  The nuclear brinksmanship game is an extremely dangerous game to play.  And the civilian populations always end up on the dirty end of the stick.  What else is new?  And what happens when the low level party game is over and it becomes nuclear kung fu… or jujitsu?  But you get the idea.

Also, with 63 nuclear reactors at 18 different locations, Fukushima is not the only source of enriched materials that the Japanese have access to.  They have a many more reactor sources and lots of materials to play with.  They can furnish enriched nuclear materials to Iran any time they please.  Losing Fukushima means nothing.  Did the Israelis honestly think that Japan would somehow be afraid of them… permanently? And what about the Chinese?  They are not afraid to sail their ships right into the Mediterranean.  And Russian war ships are in port in Syria right now.  Israel is not very well protected if the nuclear conversation begins to involve more game players or the discussion becomes more “intense”.  Would anyone blame the Japanese for responding to an Israeli act of war? The Japanese would certainly be within their rights if indeed the Israelis opened the nuclear discussion between them via acts of mass murder… the tsunami bomb coastal mass murders then the Fukushima camera bomb radiation murders. 

Generally speaking, I would think that secret acts of mass murder would make for rather poor diplomacy as the truth unfolds later on.  That can’t end well. One other question:  Has there been any significant discussion that you know about with regard to the Japanese reducing/mitigating the nuclear contamination at the Fukushima site?  There have to be quite a number of tons of fairly hot irradiated metals sitting there now.  A lot of that radio active steel (and other alloys) can be rendered much less contaminated with high temperature HydrOx plasma torch processing… a simple and inexpensive process (comparatively speaking).  There are process containment issues but nothing that the Japanese cannot handle (based on their demonstrated engineering ability).  Hopefully your investigative efforts will bear positive fruit out into the future.
Regards, Regards,
Dear Sirs, The Japanese, the Pentagon, the Chinese etc. know who attacked Japan on March 11, 2011. They have no intention of harming innocent Israelis to retaliate for the actions of their leaders. The specific individuals responsible for this attack, people like Benjamin Netanyahu, J. Rockefeller, Peter Hans Kolvenbach, Rahm Emmanuel, Paul Wolfowitz, the pope etc. know that they will not be on this planet for very long.

Here is a summary of complex research made by a Finnish Academic that outlines in detail economic and financial sabotage directed against the Finnish people by the Financial mafia cartel. She wants support for a lawsuit against them. Any interested party should contact this writer and they will be given the full set of detailed legal documents.

In search of justice – Summary of an international law case in Finland

by Jukka Davidsson

Finland, as so many other countries in Europe as well as in Asia, experienced a devastating economical collapse in the 1990’s. This writer has been researching the event privately and in the Uppsala University, Sweden. The summary presented here is only a superficial scratch of the very complex case. Only main events, outcomes together with the legal analysis will be presented. The huge amount of victims should finally get justice.

This is a story of a country which has been sold to foreign actors i.e. foreign people planned and executed the economical destruction and local top people aided the process. In this sense there are no news compared with other cases.

The background of the developments in Finland lies on the concept of globalization. All capabilities to protect the country were lifted. This is, financial market was opened and local finance inspection was controlled. The so called market forces made everything happen.

The planning of the banking crises began in early state in 1990. First in 1992 when the chaos was well on the way started to happen. In March President Mauno Koivisto invited the top baking executives to the presidential premises. The message of the banks was that they should get rid of liabilities up to FIM 180 billion. When calculated this number with all liabilities the real figure would be about FIM 256 billion. This equals about 45 percent of all liabilities on the banking sector. The plan was accepted and adopted.

The following meeting held with the President Koivisto took place in May 1992. This time the judicial people were invited to the President Koivisto. Although President Koivisto was officially the host of the seminar, the program and management of the seminar was carried out by invited people. The invited group, about 40 people, consisted of the Supreme Court

members, judges from lower level courts as well as professors of law. Finance Inspection

authority was also invited. According to the invitation letter the objective of the seminar was to evaluate and criticize the judicial operations and practice. The outcome of the seminar was the total collapse of the legal system in Finland. The effective remedies and fair trial as legal principles were removed. One study presented the result of the meeting with the following figure – out of about 3000 hearings banks won 2998 and the debtor only two.

Although the period of financial crises consists of several taskforces and publication the third quotable matter is the secret agreement signed in October 1993 between the major banks and the State of Finland. Parties agreed that the buyers were entitled to transfer customers with loans and guarantees to the bad bank Arsenal. The right to transfer was defined through the ownership of companies and through loan agreements i.e. promissory notes and notes of debt etc. It was also agreed that the banks were entitled to transfer certain lines of businesses which are real estate business and any business related to real estate business, other investment business, construction, any retail business, hotel and restaurant business, any business related to leisure business. This meant from bank customer point of view that the banks were entitled to transfer any customer or force the company in bankruptcy. Beside private people about 22 percent of all active companies faced the bankruptcy. According to the bank of Finland provided statistics about FIM 256 billion worth nominal value loans were transferred out from banks. Due to the undervaluation of properties the real amount of stolen property is about 1,7 – 2 times of the nominal value. This is that the stolen value would be about 70 – 90 billion Euros.

Other outcomes besides the lost property values are the decreased volumes in sales, construction etc. The horrified result of this exercise is the increased numbers of suicides, divorces and mental damages and so on.

People have tried to get justice, tried to get the case of their heard by an independent court. So far this has not succeeded. There is, however, one possibility to do. It is the international criminal law based on the universality principle.

The fair trial and effective remedies are the core elements in a constitutional state. In Finland those values were forgotten during the time of banking crisis. The case law provides the proof on that issue. The rulings of the European Court of Human Rights support the comprehension. In the absence of fair trials and effective remedies the trials are useless. Therefore it is important to discuss the additional possibilities how the victims of the Finnish plot would be able to enjoy the benefits of fair justice, claim damages and begin the healing process.

The main are in the international trial would be crimes against the humanity. The crime against humanity is described in the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity of the United Nations as follows: The General Assembly of the United Nations states in its resolutions 2184(XXI) of 12 December 1966 and 2202(XXI) of 16 December 1966 which expresslycondemned as crimes against humanity the violation of the economic and political rights. The Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court is another foundation for the elements of the crime of the crimes against humanity.

Thousands of deaths should be analyzed against elements of crime like causing death by indirect methods or extermination by inflicting conditions of life. Further there are questions concerning serious discrimination, expropriation, crime against humanity of imprisonment, torture i.e. the perpetrator inflicted severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon one or more persons, persecution i.e. the perpetrator severely deprived, contrary to international law, one or more persons of fundamental rights, other inhumane acts i.e. the perpetrator inflicted great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health, by means of an inhumane act.

In this context we shouldn’t either forget in this context the United Nations’ Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power and Principles of international co-operation in the detection, arrest, extradition of persons guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Among other things following requirements are presented by the United Nations:

“Victims” means persons who, individually or collectively, have suffered harm, including physical or mental injury, emotional suffering, economic loss or substantial impairment of their fundamental rights, through acts or omissions that are in violation of criminal laws operative within Member States, including those laws proscribing criminal abuse of power.

War crimes and crimes against humanity, wherever they are committed, shall be subject to investigation and the persons against whom there is evidence that they have committed such crimes shall be subject to tracing, arrest, trial and, if found guilty, to punishment.

The Finnish people are persistent and unyielding. At the moment this process needs international support and some resources. The European international lawyers have accepted the case and they are ready and willing to file the case. The proof and documentation exists. This trial would be partly a trial against the international financial cabal.